Second, I am checking those web pages and do not see anything that suggest a Lync client for Mobile devices is in development. 89.203.146.126 ( talk) 18:28, 3 April 2011 (UTC) Reply įirst, to prove something in Wikipedia, simply provide a source that says so. How can it be proven that it is not possible to connect? (directly without OCS2007 components) Note please that all MS official pages ( and ) says that Lync Mobile is under development. Pur ple back pack 89 23:32, 1 April 2011 (UTC) Reply As I mentioned in message to FleetComand, CoMo (comunicator mobile) is designed for OCS 2007 R2 and use with Lync Server 2010 requires components of OCS2007 R2 (and in fact it requires kind of workaround). As for mobile clients not being able to connect Microsoft Lync Server, I think we need source.Īny feedback? Fleet Command ( talk) 06:42, 1 April 2011 (UTC) Reply Sounds like what was there was sourced and what he wants to add is unsourced, to say nothing of incoherent. I believe that the words "dubbed Microsoft Communicator Mobile" in the article, as well as the section title, "Microsoft Communicator Mobile" addresses this concern. He believes that:Įxisting "wording" is inaccurate and may make false "feelings" that there is existing client software for Lync server available, moreover CoMo (communicator mobile) is not branded as “Lync” so again it not fits… If the article is about “Microsoft Lync (formerly Microsoft Office Communicator) and Microsoft Communicator for Mac are instant messaging clients used with Microsoft Lync Server and are replacements for Windows Messenger which was used with Exchange Messaging Server.” then statement in part about mobile version of this client software is not correct as none of mentioned software is able to connect to Microsoft Lync Server (they are however able to connect to OCS2007R2 server).īut I personally do not agree. So, I'd like to have a third opinion on this if possible. ![]() Editor 89.203.146.126 has made this edit to the article which I do not agree with.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |